Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile vs Pro 5500 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking323not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.64no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 14Vega 10
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date4 August 2020 (5 years ago)1 June 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15363584
Core clock speed1187 MHz1138 MHz
Boost clock speed1757 MHz1301 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate168.7291.4
Floating-point processing power5.398 TFLOPS9.326 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs96224
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s409.6 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.21.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 August 2020 1 June 2018
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 120 Watt

Pro 5500 XT has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

RX Vega 56 Mobile, on the other hand, has 4.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5500 XT and Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5500 XT is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 73 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 5500 XT or Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.