Matrox G550 PCIe vs Radeon Pro 5300

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking296not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency15.99no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)G500 (2001−2005)
GPU code nameNavi 14Condor
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 August 2020 (4 years ago)13 July 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz125 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Wattno data
Texture fill rate132.00.25
Floating-point processing power4.224 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs802

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x1
Lengthno data112 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.5
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 August 2020 13 July 2005
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 180 nm

Pro 5300 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5300 and Matrox G550 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5300 is a workstation graphics card while Matrox G550 PCIe is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5300
Radeon Pro 5300
Matrox G550 PCIe
G550 PCIe

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 98 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox G550 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.