ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256 vs Radeon Pro 5300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking351not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency15.40no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameNavi 14R300
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date4 August 2020 (5 years ago)1 July 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz325 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 million110 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt37 Watt
Texture fill rate132.02.600
Floating-point processing power4.224 TFLOPSno data
ROPs328
TMUs808
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8AGP 8x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz310 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s19.84 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 August 2020 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 37 Watt

Pro 5300 has an age advantage of 18 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256, on the other hand, has 129.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5300 and FireGL 9700 X1-256. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5300
Radeon Pro 5300
ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256
FireGL 9700 X1-256

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 100 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate FireGL 9700 X1-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 5300 or FireGL 9700 X1-256, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.