Radeon Graphics 384SP vs Pro 460

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking554not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.15no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameBaffinCezanne
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date30 October 2016 (9 years ago)13 April 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024384
Core clock speed850 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed907 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate58.0540.80
Floating-point processing power1.858 TFLOPS1.306 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs6424
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8IGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1270 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth81.28 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 October 2016 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

Pro 460 has 29% lower power consumption.

Graphics 384SP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon Graphics 384SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 460 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon Graphics 384SP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 36 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 40 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 384SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 460 or Radeon Graphics 384SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.