Iris Plus Graphics vs Radeon Picasso Embedded

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated720
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.92
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code namePicassoIce Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno datano data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192512
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1301 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate15.6132.00
Floating-point processing power0.4996 TFLOPS1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs1232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x1
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
OpenGL4.64.6

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

Picasso Embedded has 50% lower power consumption.

Iris Plus Graphics, on the other hand, has a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Picasso Embedded and Iris Plus Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Picasso Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 493 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Picasso Embedded or Iris Plus Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.