Radeon 550X 640SP vs PRO WX 9100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking221not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.93no data
Power efficiency9.71no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameVega 10Lexa
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 July 2017 (8 years ago)11 April 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096640
Core clock speed1200 MHz1019 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1071 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate384.042.84
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPS1.371 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs25640
L1 Cache1 MB160 KB
L2 Cache4 MB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s48 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 July 2017 11 April 2018
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 50 Watt

PRO WX 9100 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

550X 640SP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 360% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO WX 9100 and Radeon 550X 640SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 9100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 550X 640SP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Radeon PRO WX 9100
AMD Radeon 550X 640SP
Radeon 550X 640SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 34 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 550X 640SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO WX 9100 or Radeon 550X 640SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.