Playstation 5 GPU vs Radeon PRO WX 9100

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking169not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.12no data
Power efficiency9.73no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameVega 10Oberon Plus
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 July 2017 (7 years ago)28 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962304
Core clock speed1200 MHz2233 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2233 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million10,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate384.0321.6
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPS10.29 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs256144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mm390 mm
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.1.1251.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 July 2017 28 September 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 180 Watt

Playstation 5 GPU has an age advantage of 5 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 27.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO WX 9100 and Playstation 5 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 9100 is a workstation graphics card while Playstation 5 GPU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Radeon PRO WX 9100
AMD Playstation 5 GPU
Playstation 5 GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 33 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 1810 votes

Rate Playstation 5 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.