ATI FirePro V3800 vs Radeon PRO WX 9100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking167not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.18no data
Power efficiency9.73no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameVega 10Redwood
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date10 July 2017 (7 years ago)26 April 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 $129

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096400
Core clock speed1200 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt43 Watt
Texture fill rate384.013.00
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPS0.52 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs25620

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB512 MB
Memory bus width2048 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.1.125N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 July 2017 26 April 2010
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 43 Watt

PRO WX 9100 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI V3800, on the other hand, has 434.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO WX 9100 and FirePro V3800. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Radeon PRO WX 9100
ATI FirePro V3800
FirePro V3800

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 33 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 41 vote

Rate FirePro V3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.