Quadro M5000 SE vs Radeon PRO WX 3100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking622not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.44no data
Power efficiency7.31no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameLexaGM204
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date12 June 2017 (8 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122048
Core clock speed925 MHz861 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHz1038 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate39.01132.9
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPS4.252 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32128
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz6612 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s211.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 100 Watt

PRO WX 3100 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 53.8% lower power consumption.

M5000 SE, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO WX 3100 and Quadro M5000 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
Radeon PRO WX 3100
NVIDIA Quadro M5000 SE
Quadro M5000 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 64 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro M5000 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO WX 3100 or Quadro M5000 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.