Quadro 6000 SDI vs Radeon PRO WX 3100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking623not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.41no data
Power efficiency7.26no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameLexaGF100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date12 June 2017 (8 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $11,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512448
Core clock speed925 MHz574 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,200 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt231 Watt
Texture fill rate39.0132.14
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPS1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs3256
L1 Cache128 KB896 KB
L2 Cache512 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Length145 mm248 mm
Width1-slotQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz747 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s143.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video, 2x SDI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 June 2017 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 231 Watt

PRO WX 3100 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 255.4% lower power consumption.

6000 SDI, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO WX 3100 and Quadro 6000 SDI. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
Radeon PRO WX 3100
NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI
Quadro 6000 SDI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 64 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 9 votes

Rate Quadro 6000 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO WX 3100 or Quadro 6000 SDI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.