ATI Radeon 9200 SE vs PRO WX 2100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7031601
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.02no data
Power efficiency9.92no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameLexaRV280
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 June 2017 (8 years ago)1 March 2003 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed925 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,200 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate39.010.8
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs324
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 8x
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth48 GB/s2.656 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)8.1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO WX 2100 1894
+94600%
Samples: 265
ATI 9200 SE 2
Samples: 78

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 20−22 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 7−8 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Counter-Strike 2 20−22 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Fortnite 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 5 12−14 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 no data
Valorant 55−60 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Counter-Strike 2 20−22 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Dota 2 40−45 no data
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Fortnite 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 5 12−14 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Metro Exodus 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data
Valorant 55−60 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Dota 2 40−45 no data
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data
Valorant 55−60 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 27−30 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4 no data
Metro Exodus 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 no data
Valorant 45−50 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 9−10 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2017 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 28 Watt

PRO WX 2100 has an age advantage of 14 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 SE, on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Radeon 9200 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9200 SE is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 57 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 71 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO WX 2100 or Radeon 9200 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.