Quadro Plex 2100 S4 vs Radeon PRO WX 2100

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking642not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.90no data
Power efficiency9.38no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameLexaG80
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date4 June 2017 (7 years ago)25 July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512128
Core clock speed925 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,200 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt640 Watt
Texture fill rate39.0138.40
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPS0.3456 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs3232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mm522 mm
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth48 GB/s76.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2017 25 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 640 Watt

PRO WX 2100 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 1728.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Quadro Plex 2100 S4. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Radeon PRO WX 2100
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 S4
Quadro Plex 2100 S4

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 50 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro Plex 2100 S4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.