TITAN Ada vs Radeon PRO W7900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.58no data
Power efficiency17.61no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 31AD102
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 April 2023 (1 year ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$3,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores614418432
Core clock speed1855 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed2495 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors57,700 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Watt800 Watt
Texture fill rate958.11,452
Floating-point processing power61.32 TFLOPS92.9 TFLOPS
ROPs192192
TMUs384576
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Cores96144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length280 mm336 mm
Width3-slotQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin2x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount48 GB48 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth864.0 GB/s1.15 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.11x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 295 Watt 800 Watt

PRO W7900 has 171.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7900 and TITAN Ada. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7900 is a workstation graphics card while TITAN Ada is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7900
Radeon PRO W7900
NVIDIA TITAN Ada
TITAN Ada

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4
75 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7
3 votes

Rate TITAN Ada on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.