Radeon Instinct MI355X vs PRO W7900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking25not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.42no data
Power efficiency17.51no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)CDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameNavi 31CDNA Next
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 April 2023 (3 years ago)2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores614416384
Core clock speed1855 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed2495 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors57,700 million185,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Watt1400 Watt
Texture fill rate958.12,457.6
Floating-point processing power61.32 TFLOPS78.64 TFLOPS
ROPs192no data
TMUs3841024
Tensor Coresno data1024
Ray Tracing Cores96no data
L0 Cache3 MBno data
L1 Cache3 MB4 MB
L2 Cache6 MB16 MB
L3 Cache96 MB256 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length280 mmno data
Width3-slotOAM Module
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM3e
Maximum RAM amount48 GB288 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth864.0 GB/s8.19 TB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.7N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 288 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 295 Watt 1400 Watt

PRO W7900 has 375% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI355X, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 67% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7900 and Radeon Instinct MI355X. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 90 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 8 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI355X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7900 or Radeon Instinct MI355X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.