A10M vs Radeon PRO W7900
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 23 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 7.40 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 17.43 | no data |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025) | Ampere (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | Navi 31 | GA102 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 April 2023 (2 years ago) | February 2022 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,999 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 6144 | 7168 |
| Core clock speed | 1855 MHz | 975 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2495 MHz | 1635 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 57,700 million | 28,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 295 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 958.1 | 366.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 61.32 TFLOPS | 23.44 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 192 | 80 |
| TMUs | 384 | 224 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 224 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 96 | 56 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 280 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | 3-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin EPS |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 48 GB | 20 GB |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 320 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1563 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 864.0 GB/s | 500.2 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 | No outputs |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.6 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Maximum RAM amount | 48 GB | 20 GB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 295 Watt | 150 Watt |
PRO W7900 has a 140% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.
A10M, on the other hand, has 96.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7900 and A10M. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
