Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile vs Radeon PRO W7800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation29.53no data
Power efficiency19.74no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Xe-LPG (2023)
GPU code nameNavi 31Meteor Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 April 2023 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4480896
Core clock speed1855 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2499 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors57,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate699.7123.2
Floating-point processing power44.78 TFLOPS3.942 TFLOPS
ROPs12824
TMUs28056
Ray Tracing Cores70no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16Ring Bus
Length280 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 April 2023 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 5 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 65 Watt

PRO W7800 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 300% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7800 and Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7800 is a workstation graphics card while Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7800
Radeon PRO W7800
Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 31 vote

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.