GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER vs Radeon PRO W7700
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 54 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 31.54 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 22.32 | no data |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) |
| GPU code name | Navi 32 | GB203 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 November 2023 (1 year ago) | 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $749 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3072 | 8960 |
| Core clock speed | 1900 MHz | 2295 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2600 MHz | 2452 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 28,100 million | 45,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 190 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 499.2 | 686.6 |
| Floating-point processing power | 31.95 TFLOPS | 43.94 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 192 | 280 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 280 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 70 |
| L0 Cache | 768 KB | no data |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 8.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | 304 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 576.0 GB/s | 896.0 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| CUDA | - | 12.0 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Power consumption (TDP) | 190 Watt | 350 Watt |
PRO W7700 has 84.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7700 and GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
