GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER vs Radeon PRO W7700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking54not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation31.74no data
Power efficiency22.24no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameNavi 32GB203
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 November 2023 (1 year ago)2026
Launch price (MSRP)$999 $749

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30728960
Core clock speed1900 MHz2295 MHz
Boost clock speed2600 MHz2452 MHz
Number of transistors28,100 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rate499.2686.6
Floating-point processing power31.95 TFLOPS43.94 TFLOPS
ROPs9696
TMUs192280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Cores4870
L0 Cache768 KBno data
L1 Cache768 KB8.8 MB
L2 Cache2 MB48 MB
L3 Cache64 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length241 mm304 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/s896.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.11x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 350 Watt

PRO W7700 has 84.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7700 and GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7700
Radeon PRO W7700
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 12 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 46 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7700 or GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.