STG-2000 vs Radeon PRO W7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking122not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation37.76no data
Power efficiency22.97no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)no data
GPU code nameNavi 33NV1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 August 2023 (2 years ago)30 September 1995 (29 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speedno data75 MHz
Boost clock speed2440 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,300 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm500 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt2 Watt
Texture fill rate312.30.08
ROPs641
TMUs1281

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCI
Length241 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6FPM
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed18 GB/s50 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s400.0 MB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.11x VGA, 1x DB13W3

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)1.0
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.2N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2023 30 September 1995
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 MB
Chip lithography 6 nm 500 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 2 Watt

PRO W7600 has an age advantage of 27 years, a 819100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 8233.3% more advanced lithography process.

STG-2000, on the other hand, has 6400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7600 and STG-2000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7600 is a workstation graphics card while STG-2000 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
NVIDIA STG-2000
STG-2000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 83 votes

Rate STG-2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7600 or STG-2000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.