Radeon Pro 575 vs PRO W7600
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 124 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 38.56 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 23.21 | no data |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
| GPU code name | Navi 33 | Polaris 20 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 3 August 2023 (2 years ago) | 5 June 2017 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 1096 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2440 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 13,300 million | 5,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 312.3 | 140.3 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 4.489 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 2 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 18 GB/s | 1695 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 217.0 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.2.131 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 3 August 2023 | 5 June 2017 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 120 Watt |
PRO W7600 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.
Pro 575, on the other hand, has 8.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7600 and Radeon Pro 575. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon PRO W7600 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Pro 575 is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
