Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB vs PRO W7600

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking127not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation77.20no data
Power efficiency19.88no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameNavi 33Navi 31
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date3 August 2023 (1 year ago)13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20484480
Core clock speedno data1895 MHz
Boost clock speed2440 MHz2525 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt281 Watt
Texture fill rate312.3707.0
Floating-point processing powerno data45.25 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs128280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mm280 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed18 GB/s2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s864.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.13x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2023 13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 281 Watt

PRO W7600 has an age advantage of 3 months, and 116.2% lower power consumption.

PRO W7800 48 GB, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7600 and Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB
Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7600 or Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.