Radeon Instinct MI50 vs PRO W7600

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking128not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation69.61no data
Power efficiency19.77no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 33Vega 20
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date3 August 2023 (1 year ago)18 November 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20483840
Core clock speedno data1200 MHz
Boost clock speed2440 MHz1746 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million13,230 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate312.3419.0
Floating-point processing powerno data13.41 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs128240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed18 GB/s1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s1.02 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.11x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2023 18 November 2018
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 300 Watt

PRO W7600 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 130.8% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI50, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7600 and Radeon Instinct MI50. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
AMD Radeon Instinct MI50
Radeon Instinct MI50

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 13 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.