Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 vs PRO W7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking130not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation37.89no data
Power efficiency22.89no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 33Tahiti
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 August 2023 (2 years ago)31 January 2012 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048768
Core clock speedno data800 MHz
Boost clock speed2440 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,300 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate312.338.40
Floating-point processing powerno data1.229 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs12848
L1 Cacheno data192 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed18 GB/s1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s240.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.11x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.75.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.21.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2023 31 January 2012
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 85 Watt

PRO W7600 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 167% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 367% more advanced lithography process.

HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2, on the other hand, has 53% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7600 and Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7600 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 8 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7600 or Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.