Quadro Plex 2200 D2 vs Radeon PRO W7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking123not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation36.56no data
Power efficiency22.48no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameNavi 33GT200B
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date3 August 2023 (1 year ago)25 July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048240 ×2
Core clock speedno data648 MHz
Boost clock speed2440 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,300 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt640 Watt
Texture fill rate312.351.84 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6221 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs6432 ×2
TMUs12880 ×2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mm522 mm
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed18 GB/s800 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s102.4 GB/s ×2
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1No outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.74.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.21.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2023 25 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 640 Watt

PRO W7600 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 816.7% more advanced lithography process, and 392.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7600 and Quadro Plex 2200 D2. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 D2
Quadro Plex 2200 D2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro Plex 2200 D2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7600 or Quadro Plex 2200 D2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.