Quadro NVS 280 AGP vs Radeon PRO W7600

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking130not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation71.08no data
Power efficiency19.48no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameNavi 33NV34 A1
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date3 August 2023 (1 year ago)25 May 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speedno data275 MHz
Boost clock speed2440 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,300 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate312.31.100
ROPs644
TMUs1284

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8AGP 8x
Length241 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed18 GB/s250 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.11x DMS-59

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0a
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (2.1)
OpenCL2.2N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2023 25 May 2004
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 6 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 13 Watt

PRO W7600 has an age advantage of 19 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 280 AGP, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7600 and Quadro NVS 280 AGP. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 AGP
Quadro NVS 280 AGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro NVS 280 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.