ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Mac Edition vs PRO W7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking125not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation37.66no data
Power efficiency23.09no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameNavi 33M74
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date3 August 2023 (2 years ago)28 June 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204840
Core clock speedno data650 MHz
Boost clock speed2440 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,300 million180 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Wattno data
Texture fill rate312.32.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.052 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs1284
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed18 GB/s800 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model6.74.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.2N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2023 28 June 2007
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 6 nm 65 nm

PRO W7600 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7600 and Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7600 is a workstation graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Mac Edition is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Mac Edition
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 5 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7600 or Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.