GeForce 7050 SE + nForce 630a vs Radeon PRO W7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking127not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation38.02no data
Power efficiency22.89no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameNavi 33C68
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 August 2023 (2 years ago)1 February 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speedno data425 MHz
Boost clock speed2440 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,300 million112 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Wattno data
Texture fill rate312.30.85
ROPs641
TMUs1282

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCI
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed18 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.73.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.2N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2023 1 February 2006
Chip lithography 6 nm 90 nm

PRO W7600 has an age advantage of 17 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7600 and GeForce 7050 SE + nForce 630a. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7600 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 7050 SE + nForce 630a is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
NVIDIA GeForce 7050 SE + nForce 630a
GeForce 7050 SE + nForce 630a

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate GeForce 7050 SE nForce 630a on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7600 or GeForce 7050 SE + nForce 630a, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.