Quadro NVS 280 SD vs Radeon PRO W7500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1931591
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation39.86no data
Power efficiency34.85no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameNavi 33NV18 C1
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date3 August 2023 (2 years ago)31 May 2005 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792no data
Core clock speed1500 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,300 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate190.41.000
Floating-point processing power12.19 TFLOPSno data
ROPs642
TMUs1124
Ray Tracing Cores28no data
L0 Cache448 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8AGP 8x
Length216 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1344 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth172.0 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.11x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)8.0
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL2.2N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO W7500 13298
+664800%
Samples: 103
NVS 280 SD 2
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2023 31 May 2005
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 6 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 10 Watt

PRO W7500 has an age advantage of 18 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 280 SD, on the other hand, has 600% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7500 and Quadro NVS 280 SD. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 SD
Quadro NVS 280 SD

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 22 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Quadro NVS 280 SD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7500 or Quadro NVS 280 SD, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.