GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile vs Radeon PRO W7500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking126not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation100.00no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameNavi 33G72
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 August 2023 (1 year ago)18 January 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792no data
Core clock speed1500 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,300 million112 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate190.41.800
Floating-point processing power12.19 TFLOPSno data
ROPs642
TMUs1124
Ray Tracing Cores28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Length216 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1344 MHz266 MHz
Memory bandwidth172.0 GB/s4.256 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.11x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.73.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.2N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2023 18 January 2006
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 6 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 23 Watt

PRO W7500 has an age advantage of 17 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

7300 GS Low Profile, on the other hand, has 204.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7500 and GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7500 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile
GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 14 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.