Radeon Instinct MI200 vs PRO W6500M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)CDNA 2.0 (2021)
GPU code nameNavi 24Aldebaran
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release dateno dataDecember 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10246656
Core clock speed1512 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed2040 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 million58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate130.6707.2
Floating-point processing power4.178 TFLOPS22.63 TFLOPS
ROPs32no data
TMUs64416
Ray Tracing Cores16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s1,638 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.7N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 300 Watt

PRO W6500M has 1100% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI200, on the other hand, has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W6500M and Radeon Instinct MI200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W6500M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon Instinct MI200 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W6500M
Radeon PRO W6500M
AMD Radeon Instinct MI200
Radeon Instinct MI200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon PRO W6500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W6500M or Radeon Instinct MI200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.