Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile vs PRO W6300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking417not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency40.91no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 24Barcelo
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date19 January 2022 (4 years ago)6 January 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768448
Core clock speed1512 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2040 MHz1800 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 million10,700 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate97.9250.40
Floating-point processing power3.133 TFLOPS1.613 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs4828
Ray Tracing Cores12no data
L0 Cache192 KBno data
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data
L3 Cache8 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4IGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width32 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth64 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 6 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 45 Watt

PRO W6300 has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W6300 and Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W6300 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W6300
Radeon PRO W6300
AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile
Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 58 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W6300 or Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.