Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3 vs PRO W6300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking411not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency40.70no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 24Banks
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date19 January 2022 (3 years ago)18 April 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768320
Core clock speed1512 MHz1030 MHz
Boost clock speed2040 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,400 million690 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate97.9220.60
Floating-point processing power3.133 TFLOPS0.6592 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs4820
Ray Tracing Cores12no data
L0 Cache192 KBno data
L1 Cache256 KB80 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB128 KB
L3 Cache8 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width32 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s16 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.76.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.1 (1.2)
Vulkan1.31.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 January 2022 18 April 2017
Chip lithography 6 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 50 Watt

PRO W6300 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W6300 and Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W6300 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W6300
Radeon PRO W6300
AMD Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3
Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 10 votes

Rate Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W6300 or Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.