Radeon Instinct MI350X vs PRO V710

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking196not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency15.26no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)CDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameNavi 32CDNA Next
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date3 October 2024 (1 year ago)2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores345616384
Core clock speed1900 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed2000 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors28,100 million185,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)158 Watt1000 Watt
Texture fill rate432.02,252.8
Floating-point processing power27.65 TFLOPS72.09 TFLOPS
ROPs96no data
TMUs2161024
Tensor Coresno data1024
Ray Tracing Cores54no data
L0 Cache864 KBno data
L1 Cache768 KB4 MB
L2 Cache2 MB16 MB
L3 Cache54 MB256 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Width1-slotOAM Module
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM3e
Maximum RAM amount28 GB288 GB
Memory bus width224 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth504.0 GB/s8.19 TB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.8N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 28 GB 288 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 158 Watt 1000 Watt

PRO V710 has 532.9% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI350X, on the other hand, has a 928.6% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO V710 and Radeon Instinct MI350X. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710
AMD Radeon Instinct MI350X
Radeon Instinct MI350X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 29 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI350X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO V710 or Radeon Instinct MI350X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.