Qualcomm Adreno 840 vs Radeon PRO V710

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking196not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency15.25no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)no data
GPU code nameNavi 32no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date3 October 2024 (1 year ago)24 September 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3456no data
Core clock speed1900 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2000 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors28,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)158 Wattno data
Texture fill rate432.0no data
Floating-point processing power27.65 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs216no data
Ray Tracing Cores54no data
L0 Cache864 KBno data
L1 Cache768 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data
L3 Cache54 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount28 GBno data
Memory bus width224 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth504.0 GB/sno data
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.2no data
Vulkan1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 October 2024 24 September 2025

Qualcomm Adreno 840 has an age advantage of 11 months.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO V710 and Qualcomm Adreno 840. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation graphics card while Qualcomm Adreno 840 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710
Qualcomm Adreno 840
Adreno 840

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO V710 or Qualcomm Adreno 840, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.