GeForce Go 7950 GTX MXM-IV vs Radeon PRO V710
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 196 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 15.26 | no data |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) | Curie (2003−2013) |
| GPU code name | Navi 32 | G71 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 3 October 2024 (1 year ago) | 12 October 2006 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3456 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 1900 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2000 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 28,100 million | 278 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 158 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 432.0 | 13.80 |
| Floating-point processing power | 27.65 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 96 | 16 |
| TMUs | 216 | 24 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 54 | no data |
| L0 Cache | 864 KB | no data |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | no data |
| L3 Cache | 54 MB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | MXM-IV |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 28 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 224 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 504.0 GB/s | 44.8 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 9.0c (9_3) |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1.2 (full) 3.x (partial) |
| OpenCL | 2.2 | N/A |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 3 October 2024 | 12 October 2006 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 28 GB | 512 MB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 158 Watt | 45 Watt |
PRO V710 has an age advantage of 17 years, a 5500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.
Go 7950 GTX MXM-IV, on the other hand, has 251.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO V710 and GeForce Go 7950 GTX MXM-IV. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce Go 7950 GTX MXM-IV is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
