GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs Radeon Next

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated106
Place by popularitynot in top-10061
Power efficiencyno data27.84
ArchitectureGCN 6.0Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 10AD107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data3 January 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3072
Core clock speed1000 MHz1545 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1890 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data115 Watt
Texture fill rateno data181.4
Floating-point processing powerno data11.61 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data96
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm

RTX 4060 Mobile has a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Next and GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Next is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Next
Radeon Next
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 11 votes

Rate Radeon Next on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4823 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Next or GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.