Tesla T4 vs Radeon Instinct Vega

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated261
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data26.62
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVega 20TU104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data13 September 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2560
Core clock speed1000 MHz585 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data254.4
Floating-point processing powerno data8.141 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L1 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speed2400 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data320.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 70 Watt

Instinct Vega has a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

Tesla T4, on the other hand, has 221.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Instinct Vega and Tesla T4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Instinct Vega is a desktop graphics card while Tesla T4 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Instinct Vega
Radeon Instinct Vega
NVIDIA Tesla T4
Tesla T4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 42 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct Vega on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 267 votes

Rate Tesla T4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Instinct Vega or Tesla T4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.