Radeon 740M vs Instinct MI300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated588
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.30
ArchitectureCDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameAqua VanjaramPhoenix2
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 January 2023 (3 years ago)31 January 2024 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14080256
Core clock speed1000 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHz2800 MHz
Number of transistors153,000 million20,900 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)600 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate1,49644.80
Floating-point processing power47.87 TFLOPS2.867 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUs88016
Tensor Cores880no data
Ray Tracing Coresno data4
L0 Cacheno data64 KB
L1 Cache3.4 MB64 KB
L2 Cache16 MB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width8192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1600 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth3,277 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader ModelN/A6.8
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL3.02.1
VulkanN/A1.3
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2023 31 January 2024
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 600 Watt 45 Watt

Radeon 740M has an age advantage of 1 year, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 1233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Instinct MI300 and Radeon 740M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Instinct MI300 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 740M is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
Radeon Instinct MI300
AMD Radeon 740M
Radeon 740M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 27 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 177 votes

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Instinct MI300 or Radeon 740M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.