Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3 vs Instinct MI300

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameAqua VanjaramBanks
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date4 January 2023 (2 years ago)18 April 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14080320
Core clock speed1000 MHz1030 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHzno data
Number of transistors153,000 million690 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)600 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate1,49620.60
Floating-point processing power47.87 TFLOPS0.6592 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUs88020
Tensor Cores880no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 GB2 GB
Memory bus width8192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth3,277 GB/s16 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 (11_1)
Shader ModelN/A6.5 (5.1)
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL3.02.1 (1.2)
VulkanN/A1.2.170
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2023 18 April 2017
Maximum RAM amount 128 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 600 Watt 50 Watt

Instinct MI300 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

520 Mobile DDR3, on the other hand, has 1100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Instinct MI300 and Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Instinct MI300 is a workstation card while Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
Radeon Instinct MI300
AMD Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3
Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 25 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 10 votes

Rate Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Instinct MI300 or Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.