Tegra 3 GPU vs Radeon Instinct MI100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCDNA 1.0 (2020)VLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameArcturusTegra 3
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date16 November 2020 (4 years ago)9 November 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7680no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz416 MHz
Boost clock speed1502 MHz520 MHz
Number of transistors50,000 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate721.04.160
Floating-point processing power23.07 TFLOPSno data
ROPs648
TMUs4808

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width4096 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1200 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1,229 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/AN/A
Shader ModelN/Ano data
OpenGLN/AES 2.0
OpenCL2.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 November 2020 9 November 2011
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 20 Watt

Instinct MI100 has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

Tegra 3 GPU, on the other hand, has 1400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Instinct MI100 and Tegra 3 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Instinct MI100 is a workstation graphics card while Tegra 3 GPU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Instinct MI100
Radeon Instinct MI100
NVIDIA Tegra 3 GPU
Tegra 3 GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 59 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Tegra 3 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Instinct MI100 or Tegra 3 GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.