Radeon RX 590 GME vs ATI IGP 350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1572not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameRS200Polaris 20
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 October 2002 (23 years ago)9 March 2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304
Core clock speed183 MHz1257 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1420 MHz
Number of transistors30 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data175 Watt
Texture fill rate0.37204.5
Floating-point processing powerno data6.543 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs2144
L1 Cacheno data576 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 October 2002 9 March 2020
Chip lithography 180 nm 14 nm

RX 590 GME has an age advantage of 17 years, and a 1186% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon IGP 350M and Radeon RX 590 GME. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon IGP 350M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 590 GME is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 13 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 951 votes

Rate Radeon RX 590 GME on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon IGP 350M or Radeon RX 590 GME, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.