ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4350 vs ATI IGP 350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1572not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameRS200M92
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 October 2002 (23 years ago)9 January 2009 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data80
Core clock speed183 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors30 million242 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm55 nm
Texture fill rate0.373.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.072 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs28
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data9.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.010.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL1.43.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 October 2002 9 January 2009
Chip lithography 180 nm 55 nm

ATI Mobility HD 4350 has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 227% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon IGP 350M and Mobility Radeon HD 4350. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 13 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 16 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon IGP 350M or Mobility Radeon HD 4350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.