GeForce 9500M GE vs ATI Radeon IGP 350M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1559not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)no data
GPU code nameRS200MCP79Mx + NB9M
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 October 2002 (23 years ago)9 January 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data24
Core clock speed183 MHzno data
Number of transistors30 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology180 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data25 Watt
Texture fill rate0.37no data
ROPs2no data
TMUs2no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR2, GDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.010.0
OpenGL1.4no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 October 2002 9 January 2008
Chip lithography 180 nm 65 nm

9500M GE has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 176.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon IGP 350M and GeForce 9500M GE. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon IGP 350M
Radeon IGP 350M
NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE
GeForce 9500M GE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 13 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9500M GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon IGP 350M or GeForce 9500M GE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.