GeForce 9400 GT PCI vs ATI Radeon IGP 350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1565not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRS200G96C
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 October 2002 (23 years ago)27 August 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed183 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors30 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate0.374.400
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0448 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs28
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCI
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.011.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.43.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 October 2002 27 August 2008
Chip lithography 180 nm 55 nm

9400 GT PCI has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 227.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon IGP 350M and GeForce 9400 GT PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon IGP 350M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 9400 GT PCI is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon IGP 350M
Radeon IGP 350M
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI
GeForce 9400 GT PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 13 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 37 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 GT PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon IGP 350M or GeForce 9400 GT PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.