GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE vs ATI Radeon IGP 345M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon IGP 345M with GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE, including specs and performance data.

ATI IGP 345M
2002
0.01

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE outperforms ATI IGP 345M by a whopping 100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15271496
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameRS200NV28 A2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 October 2002 (22 years ago)16 February 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed183 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors30 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm150 nm
Texture fill rate0.372.200
ROPs24
TMUs28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xAGP 8x
Lengthno data216 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared275 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data4.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.08.1
OpenGL1.41.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI IGP 345M 0.01
GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE 0.02
+100%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI IGP 345M 2
GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE 6
+200%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 0.02
Recency 5 October 2002 16 February 2003
Chip lithography 180 nm 150 nm

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE has a 100% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon IGP 345M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon IGP 345M is a notebook card while GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon IGP 345M
Radeon IGP 345M
NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 345M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 30 votes

Rate GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.