GeForce3 vs ATI Radeon IGP 340M
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1598 | 1575 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Rage 6 (2000−2007) | Kelvin (2001−2003) |
| GPU code name | RS200 | NV20 A5 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 October 2002 (23 years ago) | 27 February 2001 (24 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $499 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 183 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 180 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 30 million | 57 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 180 nm | 150 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 0.37 | 1.600 |
| ROPs | 2 | 4 |
| TMUs | 2 | 8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | AGP 4x | AGP 4x |
| Length | no data | 165 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | SDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 64 MB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 230 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 3.68 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x VGA, 1x DB13W3 |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 7.0 | 8.0 |
| OpenGL | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | N/A | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | no data |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6 | no data |
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | no data |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3 | no data |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6 | no data |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7 | no data |
| Valorant | 21−24 | no data |
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 8−9 | no data |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | no data |
| Dota 2 | 7−8 | no data |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3 | no data |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6 | no data |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7 | no data |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5 | no data |
| Valorant | 21−24 | no data |
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | no data |
| Dota 2 | 7−8 | no data |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3 | no data |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6 | no data |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7 | no data |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5 | no data |
| Valorant | 21−24 | no data |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3 | no data |
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2 | no data |
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16 | no data |
| Valorant | 0−1 | no data |
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2 | no data |
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 October 2002 | 27 February 2001 |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 150 nm |
ATI IGP 340M has an age advantage of 1 year.
GeForce3, on the other hand, has a 20% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon IGP 340M and GeForce3. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon IGP 340M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce3 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
