A10G vs ATI Radeon IGP 340M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1603182
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data16.65
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRS200GA102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 October 2002 (23 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores29216
Core clock speed183 MHz1320 MHz
Boost clock speed180 MHz1710 MHz
Number of transistors30 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rate0.37492.5
Floating-point processing powerno data31.52 TFLOPS
ROPs296
TMUs2288
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L1 Cacheno data9 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1563 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data600.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI IGP 340M 2
Samples: 4
A10G 13598
+679800%
Samples: 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Dota 2 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Dota 2 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 no data

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 0−1 no data

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 October 2002 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 180 nm 8 nm

A10G has an age advantage of 18 years, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon IGP 340M and A10G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon IGP 340M is a notebook graphics card while A10G is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon IGP 340M
Radeon IGP 340M
NVIDIA A10G
A10G

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 340M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 49 votes

Rate A10G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon IGP 340M or A10G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.