RTX A5500 vs ATI Radeon IGP 340

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated40
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data18.08
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRS200GA102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date5 October 2002 (22 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data10240
Core clock speed183 MHz1080 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistors30 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data230 Watt
Texture fill rate0.37532.8
Floating-point processing powerno data34.1 TFLOPS
ROPs296
TMUs2320
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared24 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data768.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 October 2002 22 March 2022
Chip lithography 180 nm 8 nm

RTX A5500 has an age advantage of 19 years, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon IGP 340 and RTX A5500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon IGP 340 is a desktop card while RTX A5500 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon IGP 340
Radeon IGP 340
NVIDIA RTX A5500
RTX A5500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 47 votes

Rate RTX A5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.