GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile vs ATI Radeon IGP 340

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated214
Place by popularitynot in top-10076
Power efficiencyno data28.78
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRS200GA106
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 October 2002 (23 years ago)12 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3840
Core clock speed183 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors30 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data80 Watt
Texture fill rate0.37171.0
Floating-point processing powerno data10.94 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs2120
Tensor Coresno data120
Ray Tracing Coresno data30
L1 Cacheno data3.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data3 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data336.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 October 2002 12 January 2021
Chip lithography 180 nm 8 nm

RTX 3060 Mobile has an age advantage of 18 years, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon IGP 340 and GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon IGP 340 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon IGP 340
Radeon IGP 340
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 5584 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon IGP 340 or GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.