Radeon RX 6750 GRE vs ATI IGP 330M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated95
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data47.71
Power efficiencyno data13.64
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRS200Navi 22
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 May 2002 (23 years ago)17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2560
Core clock speed183 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2581 MHz
Number of transistors30 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate0.37413.0
ROPs264
TMUs2160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared18 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2002 17 October 2023
Chip lithography 180 nm 7 nm

RX 6750 GRE has an age advantage of 21 years, and a 2471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon IGP 330M and Radeon RX 6750 GRE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon IGP 330M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 6750 GRE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon IGP 330M
Radeon IGP 330M
AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE
Radeon RX 6750 GRE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 330M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 246 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon IGP 330M or Radeon RX 6750 GRE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.