AMD RX Vega M GL / 870 vs ATI IGP 320M

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated336
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Vega (2017−2021)
GPU code nameRS100Vega Kaby Lake-G
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 October 2002 (21 year old)7 January 2018 (6 years old)
Current price$184 no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1280
Core clock speed2 MHz931 MHz
Boost clock speed160 MHz1011 MHz
Number of transistors30 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology180 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data65 Watt
Texture fill rate0.16no data

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon IGP 320M and Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceAGP 4xno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory+-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012_1
OpenGL1.4no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/Ano data

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 5 October 2002 7 January 2018
Maximum RAM amount System Shared 4 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 14 nm

We couldn't decide between Radeon IGP 320M and Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon IGP 320M
Radeon IGP 320M
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 17 votes

Rate ATI Radeon IGP 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 117 votes

Rate AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.